Severe chronic kidney disease is associated with poor survival after initial CRT-defibrillator tachyarrhythmia therapy.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients who receive appropriate device therapies have limited survival, and survival benefit in chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been questioned. We examined the association between CKD and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)-defibrillator tachyarrhythmia therapies. METHODS: We compared overall survival after appropriate shocks or anti-tachycardia pacing in 439 CRT-defibrillator recipients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, non-right bundle-branch block QRS pattern, and QRS duration >130 ms according to glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at implant, including 31 patients with GFR ≤30, 164 patients with GFR 31-60, and 244 patients with GFR >60. At least one shock occurred in 302 patients (24 with GFR ≤30, 102 with GFR 31-60, and 176 with GFR >60). Serial echocardiograms were also compared. RESULTS: Patients were followed 64 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 29-94) after implant, including 32 months (IQR: 12-61) after first therapy. Time to first therapy or shock was similar across GFR groups. However, survival after first therapy declined directly with declining GFR (P < .001), with median postshock survival of 90 days for GFR ≤30 (95% confidence of interval [CI]: 0-233), 612 days (95% CI: 365-859) for GFR 31-60, and 1672 days (95% CI: 1396-1948) for GFR >60. Declining GFR category, ischemic heart disease, diabetes, and increasing age were independently associated with increased postshock mortality. Echocardiographic response was similar across GFR groups and was not associated with post-therapy survival. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after appropriate tachyarrhythmia therapies, particularly shocks, is attenuated in patients with GFR ≤30. This raises concern over potential lack of survival benefit conferred by CRT-defibrillators versus CRT-pacemakers in this population.

Oral Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in the Chronic Kidney Disease Population: the State of the Art in 2019.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac rhythm disturbance and is associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. Oral anticoagulants are effective at reducing rates of thromboembolism in patients with AF in the general population. Patients with AF and concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risk of thromboembolism and bleeding compared with patients with normal renal function. Among moderate CKD and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on chronic dialysis, the use of oral anticoagulants is controversial. Use of warfarin, while beneficial in non-CKD patients, raises a number of concerns such as increased bleeding risk, labile anticoagulant effect, and calciphylaxis, especially in the ESRD population. The newer direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) agents have demonstrated comparable efficacy and improved safety profiles compared with coumadin but are not as well studied in the CKD population. This review highlights the efficacy and safety of coumadin and the DOACs for thromboembolism prophylaxis in non-valvular AF patients with CKD.

Sex-specific clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in clinical outcomes for left bundle branch block (LBBB)-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are not well described. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study at an academic medical center included subjects with LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM who received CRT. Cox regression analyses estimated the hazard ratios (HRs) between sex and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: In 123 total subjects (mean age 62 years, mean initial left ventricular ejection fraction 22.8%, 76% New York Heart Association class III, and 98% CRT-defibrillators), 55 (45%) were men and 68 (55%) were women. The median follow-up time after CRT was 72.4 months. Similar risk for adverse clinical events (heart failure hospitalization, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, appropriate antitachycardia pacing therapy, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, and death) was observed between men and women (HR, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-2.51; p = 0.63). This persisted in multivariable analyses. Men and women had similar risk for all-cause mortality in univariable analysis, but men had higher risk in the final multivariable model that adjusted for age at diagnosis, QRS duration, and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension index (HR, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.26-16.39; p = 0.02). The estimated 5-year mortality was 9.5% for men and 6.9% for women. CONCLUSIONS: In LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM, men have higher risk for all-cause mortality after CRT when compared to women.

Amiodarone is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillators.

INTRODUCTION: Amiodarone reduces recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) but may worsen cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may also be antiarrhythmic. When patients with prior sustained VTA are upgraded to CRT defibrillators (CRT-D) from conventional implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), should concomitant amiodarone be continued or is CRT's antiarrhythmic potential sufficient? METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified 67 patients from a prospective CRT registry with spontaneous sustained VTA, New York Heart Association (NYHA) II-IV HF, and left bundle-branch block (LBBB) who were upgraded to CRT defibrillators from conventional ICDs. We compared changes in QRS duration and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) pre- and post-CRT, time to death, transplant or ventricular assist device (VAD), and time to recurrent VTA therapies between 37 patients continuing amiodarone therapy and 30 amiodarone-naïve patients. Amiodarone-treated patients had worse renal function and a higher prevalence of prior VTA storm compared with amiodarone-naïve patients. After CRT, amiodarone-treated patients demonstrated less QRS narrowing (8 vs 20 ms; P = 0.021) and less LVEF improvement (-2.7 vs +5.2%; P = 0.006). Over 29 months, 31 (47%) patients died and 13 (20%) received transplant or VAD. Risk of death, transplant, or VAD was greater in amiodarone-treated than -naïve patients (corrected hazard ratio [HR], 2.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-4.11; P = 0.022). Appropriate CRT-D therapies occurred in 37 (55%) patients; amiodarone use was not associated time to first therapy (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.59-2.16; P = 0.72). CONCLUSION: In patients with sustained VTA and LBBB upgraded from conventional ICDs to CRT defibrillators, concomitant amiodarone use is associated with less QRS narrowing, less LVEF improvement, greater risk of death, transplant, or VAD, and similar risk of recurrent VTA.

Myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy.

BACKGROUND: Baseline predictors of myocardial recovery after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in left bundle branch block (LBBB)-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) are unknown. METHODS: A retrospective study included subjects with idiopathic NICM, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, and LBBB. Myocardial recovery was defined as post-CRT LVEF ≥50%. Logistic regression analyses described associations between baseline characteristics and myocardial recovery. Cox regression analyses estimated the hazard ratio (HR) between myocardial recovery status and adverse clinical events. RESULTS: In 105 subjects (mean age 61 years, 44% male, mean initial LVEF 22.6% ± 6.6%, 81% New York Heart Association class III, and 98% CRT-defibrillators), myocardial recovery after CRT was observed in 56 (54%) subjects. Hypertension, heart rate, and serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) had negative associations with myocardial recovery in univariable analyses. These associations persisted in multivariable analysis: hypertension (odds ratio (OR), 0.40; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.95; p = 0.04), heart rate (OR per 10 bpm, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48-0.997; p = 0.048), and serum BUN (OR per 1 mg/dl, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99; p = 0.04). Subjects with post-CRT LVEF ≥50%, when compared to <50%, had lower risk for adverse clinical events (heart failure hospitalization, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, appropriate anti-tachycardia pacing therapy, ventricular assist device implantation, heart transplantation, and death) over a median follow-up of 75.9 months (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.88; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM, myocardial recovery after CRT was associated with absence of hypertension, lower heart rate, and lower serum BUN. Those with myocardial recovery had fewer adverse clinical events.

Scar burden, not intraventricular conduction delay pattern, is associated with outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) benefit less from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether post-CRT outcome differences in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) relate to intrinsic QRS pattern and/or scar burden. METHODS: We analyzed 393 consecutive ICM patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, QRS duration >120 ms, and LBBB or nonspecific IVCD who underwent single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging and CRT-defibrillator implant. We compared scar burden; QRS duration; LVEF change; risk of death, transplant, or ventricular assist device; and risk of appropriate device shocks between LBBB and IVCD patients, using multivariable analyses to determine relative associations between QRS pattern vs scar burden and outcomes. RESULTS: Nonspecific IVCD is associated with greater scar burden and narrower baseline QRS duration than LBBB. IVCD patients demonstrated less QRS narrowing with CRT than LBBB patients, even when excluding IVCD patients with QRS duration <150 ms. LVEF improved less in patients with IVCD vs LBBB, but only scar burden not QRS morphology or duration was associated with LVEF increase ≥5%. During 39-month follow-up, IVCD was associated with shorter survival free from transplant/ventricular assist device and shorter time to first appropriate device shock. Scar burden but not QRS morphology was independently associated with these outcomes on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: IVCD is associated with greater scar burden than LBBB in ICM CRT-defibrillator recipients. Scar burden, not QRS pattern, is independently associated with adverse clinical outcomes.

Oral anticoagulation and left atrial thrombi resolution in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation or flutter: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is prescribed for left atrial thrombi (LAT) in nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial flutter (AFL). The study objective was to review the existing evidence regarding LAT resolution in nonrheumatic AF and/or AFL with OAC agents. METHODS: Data sources included PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) between January 1, 1991 and February 10, 2017. English-language studies that assessed LAT resolution with OAC agents in subjects with nonrheumatic AF and/or AFL, by serial transesophageal echocardiography, and with follow-up times ≥ 3 weeks and < 1 year, were selected. Study quality was assessed using recommendations adapted from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Pooled LAT resolution rates were evaluated for vitamin K antagonist (VKA) studies and low risk of bias warfarin studies. RESULTS: The pooled LAT resolution rate of 619 subjects from 16 VKA studies was 63.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.3%-72.9%). The pooled LAT resolution rate of 94 subjects from four studies that specified warfarin use, exclusion of prior long-term therapeutic OAC, and target international normalized ratio (INR) ≥ 2.0 and/or average achieved INR ≥ 2.0 was 79.3% (95% CI, 69.8%-86.4%). Two studies in direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reported LAT resolution rates of 89.5% (17 of 19) for dabigatran and 41.5% (22 of 53) for rivaroxaban. CONCLUSIONS: Warfarin is the most studied initial OAC agent for treating LAT in nonrheumatic AF and/or AFL with a resolution rate of nearly 80%. Further studies in DOACs are warranted.

New-onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and time from diagnosis to cardiac resynchronization therapy: The NEOLITH II study.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) after diagnosis of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB)-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and treatment with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is unknown. The purpose of this study was to describe relationships between time from diagnosis to CRT and outcomes in new-onset LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study examined associations between time from diagnosis to CRT (≤9 months vs >9 months) and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS: In 123 subjects with LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM, time from diagnosis to CRT was ≤9 months in 60 (49%) subjects and 9 months in 63 (51%) subjects. Clinical outcomes were similar for those implanted ≤9 months versus >9 months for adverse clinical events (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.78; P = 0.67) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.19-1.70; P = 0.31). Multivariable analyses demonstrated similar results. In 105 subjects with post-CRT echocardiograms, LVEF improvement to >35% was more likely in those implanted ≤9 months when compared to >9 months (odds ratio [OR], 3.53; 95% CI, 1.32-9.46; P = 0.01). This association persisted in the final multivariable model adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, QRS duration, post-GDMT LVEF, and time from CRT to post-CRT echocardiogram (OR, 5.10; 95% CI, 1.71-15.22; P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: In LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM, earlier CRT implantation was associated with more favorable cardiac remodeling. Delaying CRT may miss a critical period to halt and reverse progressive myocardial damage.

Gender Differences in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Choice and Outcome in Patients ≥75 Years of Age with Heart Failure.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established therapy for heart failure and can be delivered through a CRT pacemaker (CRT-P) or a CRT defibrillator (CRT-D). CRT-P devices are smaller and less expensive, have better battery longevity, and have been subject to fewer recalls and advisories but cannot deliver high-energy shocks to terminate potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmias. As published guidelines do not distinguish between CRT-P and CRT-D indications, we examined the practice of prescribing these devices in older women and men with heart failure. A total of 512 CRT recipients (age ≥75 years, 26% women, 21% CRT-P) were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were collected on all patients, and overall survival was compared by gender and type of CRT device implanted. Women were more likely to receive CRT-Ps than men (26% vs 19%). Men with CRT-Ps were significantly older than women with CRT-Ps and both men and women with CRT-Ds (p = 0.04). In addition, women had lower all-cause mortality compared with men (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, confidence interval [CI] 0.58 to 0.99, p = 0.04), mainly among CRT-P recipients (HR 0.48, CI 0.26 to 0.8, p = 0.02), but this association was attenuated after adjusting for differences in patient characteristics (HR 0.56, CI 0.26 to 1.18, p = 0.13). In conclusion, women are more likely to receive CRT-Ps than men. Whether this difference is driven by patient preference or physician biases remains unclear. Women with CRT, particularly CRT-Ps, have a better overall survival than men. These differences, which may be driven by unbalanced baseline characteristics of patients or by differences in gender response to CRT, deserve further investigation.

Predictors and implications of early left ventricular ejection fraction improvement in new-onset idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy with narrow QRS complex: A NEOLITH substudy.

BACKGROUND: Predictors and implications of early left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in new-onset idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) with narrow QRS complex are not well described. The objectives were to describe predictors of LVEF improvement after 3 months on GDMT and adverse cardiac events based on post-GDMT LVEF status (≤35% vs. >35%). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in subjects with new-onset NICM, LVEF ≤35%, and narrow QRS complex. Associations for baseline variables with post-GDMT LVEF improvement and absolute change in LVEF (∆LVEFGDMT ) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations for post-GDMT LVEF status with adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: In 70 subjects, 31 (44%) had post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% after a median follow-up time of 97.5 days (interquartile range, 84-121 days). In final multivariable models, severely dilated left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), compared with normal LVEDD, strongly predicted post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% (odds ratio, 7.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-43.49; p = .02) and ∆LVEFGDMT (ß = -15.709; standard error = 4.622; p = .001). Subjects with post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% were more likely to have adverse cardiac events over a median follow-up time of 970.5 days (unadjusted hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.93-4.96; p = .07). In the post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% group, 9 of 26 subjects (35%) had long-term LVEF > 35%. CONCLUSION: In new-onset NICM with narrow QRS complex, nondilated LVEDD predicted early LVEF improvement. Those with post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% had higher risk of adverse cardiac events, but a substantial proportion demonstrated continued long-term LVEF improvement.

Left ventricular dimensions predict risk of appropriate shocks but not mortality in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients with left bundle-branch block and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: Patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle-branch block (LBBB) often benefit markedly from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Cardiac resynchronization therapy responders have a lower risk of appropriate device shocks from CRT-defibrillators (CRT-D) than do non-responders. Larger baseline left ventricular (LV) dimensions may be associated with less CRT response and thus greater risk of appropriate shocks. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed all (n = 249; 55% female) primary prevention CRT-D recipients at our institution with LBBB, NICM, and measured LV dimensions prior to device implant for the outcomes of (i) appropriate shocks, (ii) any appropriate tachyarrhythmia therapies, and (iii) risk of death, transplant, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD). During 59 months (interquartile range 21.5-91.5) follow-up, 19 (8%) patients received ≥1 appropriate shock, and 67 (27%) patients died, received a transplant, or required LVAD. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis of LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) per meter height vs. appropriate shock(s) revealed an area under the curve of 0.75 (95% CI 0.65-0.85; P < 0.001). No patient with indexed LVEDD <3.36 cm/m (n = 76) received a shock. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of death, transplant, or LVAD (corrected HR 1.67, 95% CI 0.90-3.03; P = 0.103) in patients with indexed LVEDD above this cut-off compared to those with smaller dimension. Among 102 patients with paired quantitative echocardiograms, there was no difference in LVEF change between patients with indexed LVEDD <3.36 cm/m (n = 27; median 11%) and larger (n = 75; median 14%). CONCLUSION: Patients with LVEDD <3.36 cm/m height prior to CRT-D implant in the setting of NICM and LBBB have minimal risk of appropriate shocks but similar risk of death, transplant- and LVAD and similar extent of LV functional improvement as patients with larger LVEDD. CRT-pacemakers may be appropriate in such patients.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Concurrently Diagnosed New Rapid Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter and New Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Characteristics and outcomes of concurrently diagnosed new rapid atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) and new heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are not well described. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of subjects referred for expedited transesophageal echocardiography-guided rhythm-control strategies for concurrent new rapid AF/AFL and new LVEF ≤ 40% diagnosed during the same admission was analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-five subjects (median age 57 years; 96% male; 96% Caucasian; median CHA2 DS2 -VASc = 2) presented with new AF (n = 18) or AFL (n = 7) with rapid ventricular rate (median 135 beats/min) and new reduced LVEF (median 27%; range, 10-37.5%). Seven (28%) subjects had left atrial appendage thrombi (LAAT) and five (20%) subjects had heavy or binge alcohol use. Baseline characteristics were similar between those with and without LAAT. Thirteen subjects with AF and without LAAT underwent direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) and 10 (77%) had AF recurrence within 90 days. Improvement of long-term LVEF to >40% was comparable for subjects with and without initial LAAT (83% vs 94%; P = 0.46). Three of four subjects who received primary prophylaxis implantable cardioverter-defibrillators improved their LVEF to >35% after sinus rhythm maintenance. The median long-term follow-up time was 3.0 years. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with concurrently diagnosed new rapid AF/AFL and new reduced LVEF are characterized by a high prevalence of LAAT and significant alcohol use. AF subjects without initial LAAT who underwent DCCV had a high 90-day AF recurrence rate. The presence of LAAT did not have a prognosticative effect on eventual LVEF improvement, which was observed in almost all subjects.

New-onset left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction response to guideline-directed therapies: The NEOLITH study.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) response to guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and to early cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in new-onset idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) is not well described. CRT is recommended if LVEF remains ≤35% after at least 3 months of GDMT. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe LVEF response to GDMT at 3 months and to early CRT in new-onset LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in subjects with new-onset idiopathic NICM, LVEF ≤35%, and LBBB or narrow (<120 ms) QRS complex morphology. LVEF response between groups was evaluated with log-binomial and linear regression. LVEF response within groups was evaluated using the paired Student t test. RESULTS: In 102 subjects (70 with narrow QRS complex and 32 with LBBB), post-GDMT LVEF was >35% in 39 narrow QRS complex subjects (56%) and 2 LBBB subjects (6%) (P < .0001). The absolute difference between post-GDMT LVEF and initial LVEF was greater in the narrow QRS complex group (16.1% ± 14.6% vs. 3.3% ± 10.7%; P < .0001). Narrow QRS complex, referenced to LBBB, was significantly associated with post-GDMT LVEF >35% (relative risk 10.30; 95% confidence interval 2.63-40.27; P = .0008) and absolute difference between post-GDMT LVEF and initial LVEF (ß = 16.296; standard error = 2.977; P < .0001) in final multivariable analyses. CRT super-response, defined as post-CRT LVEF ≥50%, was observed in 8 of LBBB subjects (35%) who received CRT. CONCLUSION: GDMT did not significantly improve LVEF in new-onset LBBB-associated idiopathic NICM at 3 months. Most remained candidates for CRT, and a high percentage were super-responders. Optimal timing for CRT implantation requires further investigation.

Clinical outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator recipients 80 years of age and older.

AIMS: Very elderly patients have not been well-represented in the randomized trials that established the benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients. We therefore compared clinical outcomes in CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) recipients ≥80 and <80 years old. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared mortality and time to first appropriate shock in 258 consecutive CRT-D patients ≥80 years old with New York Heart Association II-IV HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, QRS duration ≥120 ms, and no prior sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias to 1058 patients <80 years old implanted with CRT-D during the same timeframe. Comorbidities and medical therapy differed significantly between the groups. During 52 ± 36 months, 123 (48%) patients ≥80 and 474 (45%) patients <80 died; mortality was significantly higher among patients ≥80 [corrected hazard ratio (HR) 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.72; P = 0.003]. Among 258 patients ≥80 with device follow-up, only 20 (8%) received an appropriate shock compared with 172 (17%) shocks in 1053 patients <80 years old. Time to first appropriate shock was significantly shorter in patients <80 (corrected HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.87, P = 0.013). Older patients experienced 14 inappropriate shocks, and while life-threatening device complications were rare, complications related to the high-power components of the CRT-D system were not infrequent (n = 11). CONCLUSION: Mortality among CRT-D recipients ≥80 years old is higher than in younger patients but is not excessive. The risk of appropriate device shocks in older patients is relatively low and significantly less than in younger patients. These observations suggest that CRT-pacemakers should be given due consideration in elderly HF patients.

Utility of the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Cardiomyopathy: A Decade-Long Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) has emerged as a means of protecting patients with newly diagnosed nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) against sudden cardiac death while awaiting re-evaluation of cardiac function. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to characterize the risk of appropriate WCD therapy in newly diagnosed NICM and ICM patients according to cardiomyopathy etiology in an independent study. METHODS: Medical records of all patients prescribed a WCD between June 2004 and May 2015 at our institution (n = 639) were analyzed, focusing on 254 patients with newly diagnosed NICM and 271 patients with newly diagnosed ICM. Patients with a prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or sustained ventricular arrhythmias were excluded (n = 114). The primary endpoint was appropriate WCD therapy. RESULTS: Median WCD wear time was 61 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 25 to 102 days) per patient and 22 h/day (IQR: 17 to 23 h/day). During 56.7 patient-years, 0 NICM patients received an appropriate WCD shock, whereas 3 (1.2%) received an inappropriate shock. During 46.7 patient-years, 6 (2.2%) ICM patients received an appropriate shock; 5 survived the episode, and 4 survived to hospital discharge. All 6 patients with an appropriate shock were male with QRS duration >120 ms. Two (0.7%) ICM patients received an inappropriate shock. CONCLUSIONS: In this independent, retrospective study, the risk of appropriate WCD therapies in patients with newly diagnosed NICM was minimal. Routine use of the WCD in this population should be prospectively evaluated. The risk of appropriate therapies in newly diagnosed ICM was comparable to that observed in prior observational studies.

Mechanical dyssynchrony after cardiac resynchronization therapy for severely symptomatic heart failure is associated with risk for ventricular arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Risk factors for ventricular arrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy (CRT-D) for severely symptomatic heart failure are of clinical importance but are not clearly defined. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that mechanical dyssynchrony after CRT-D is a risk factor for ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: A total of 266 consecutive CRT-D patients with class III or IV heart failure, QRS duration ≥120 msec, and ejection fractions ≤ 35% were prospectively studied. Dyssynchrony was assessed before and 6 months after CRT-D using speckle-tracking radial strain anteroseptal-to-posterior wall delay, predefined as ≥130 msec. Ventricular arrhythmias were predefined as appropriate antitachycardia pacing or shock, and the combined end point of ventricular arrhythmias, death, transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation was followed over 2 years. RESULTS: Of the initial 266 patients, 11 died, five underwent transplantation, three received left ventricular assist devices before their 6-month echocardiographic examinations, 19 (7%) had inadequate speckle-tracking at 6-month follow-up, and 27 (10%) were lost to follow-up. Accordingly, the study group consisted of 201 patients. Dyssynchrony after CRT-D was observed in 79 (39%) and was associated with a significantly higher ventricular arrhythmic event rate: 21% (P < .001) with persistent dyssynchrony and 35% (P < .001) with new dyssynchrony, compared with 8% with no dyssynchrony after CRT-D. The combined end point of ventricular arrhythmias, death, transplantation, or left ventricular assist device implantation was significantly associated with dyssynchrony after CRT-D (hazard ratio, 2.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.49-4.28; P = .001). Dyssynchrony after CRT-D was associated with ventricular arrhythmias or death in patient subgroups by cardiomyopathy type, QRS width, and morphology (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Persistent or new radial dyssynchrony after CRT-D in severely symptomatic patients with heart failure with widened QRS complexes and reduced ejection fractions was associated with an increased rate of ventricular arrhythmias or death and appears to be a marker for a less favorable prognosis.

The association of left ventricular lead position related to regional scar by speckle-tracking echocardiography with clinical outcomes in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy is variable. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that left ventricular (LV) lead position in proximity to myocardial scar is associated with less favorable outcomes. METHODS: A total of 149 patients were included in this substudy of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region trial using echocardiographic radial strain for basal and middle LV segments and transverse strain for apical segments to estimate scar. Sixty-four patients with high-dose rest (99m)Tc sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging were used for validation in 508 LV free-wall segments. The relationship of LV lead position to segments estimated as scar was defined as concordant, adjacent, or remote. The prespecified primary end point was heart failure hospitalization or death over 2 years. RESULTS: Wall thickening < 10% by radial strain in LV free wall segments was associated with absent (99m)Tc sestamibi uptake indicative of scar with 77% sensitivity and 89% specificity and strain < 10% was accordingly used as the surrogate for scar. Event-free survival was most favorable in patients with nonischemic disease (79%), similarly favorable in patients with ischemic disease and LV leads remote from scar (74%), but significantly worse in patients with ischemic disease and LV leads adjacent to (61%) or within scar (41%) (P = .004). Preserved wall thickening at the LV lead site was independently associated with favorable outcome and additive to pacing at the site of latest mechanical activation (P = .001) and remained significant after adjusting for scar burden. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographic speckle-tracking strain has the potential to estimate free wall scar in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and influence LV lead positioning away from scar to improve clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Usefulness of echocardiographically guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermediate QRS width and non-left bundle branch block morphology.

The current guidelines most strongly support cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for patients with heart failure with a QRS width of ≥150 ms and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Our objective was to assess the potential benefit of echocardiographically guided left ventricular (LV) lead positioning for patients with a QRS width <150 ms or non-LBBB as a substudy of the Speckle Tracking Assisted Resynchronization Therapy for Electrode Region (STARTER) prospective, randomized controlled trial. The STARTER trial randomized 187 patients with heart failure, a QRS of ≥120 ms, and ejection fraction of ≤35% to LV lead guided to the site of latest mechanical activation by speckle tracking radial strain versus routine implantation. The predefined primary end point was heart failure hospitalization or death within 2 years. This substudy included 151 CRT patients with matching echocardiographic and LV lead position data and complete follow-up data. Patients with a QRS width of 120 to 149 ms or non-LBBB and LV lead concordant or adjacent to the site of latest mechanical activation had favorable outcomes after CRT similar to those with LBBB or a QRS width of ≥150 ms. In contrast, patients with a QRS of 120 to 149 ms or non-LBBB and remote LV leads had unfavorable outcomes (hazard ratio 5.45, 95% confidence interval 2.36 to 12.6, p <0.001, and hazard ratio 4.92, 95% confidence interval 2.12 to 11.39, p <0.001, respectively, with significant interaction after adjusting for baseline variables, p = 0.038 and p = 0.008). In conclusion, LV lead positioning with respect to the echocardiographic site of latest activation was significantly associated with more favorable clinical outcomes in patients with a QRS duration <150 ms and/or non-LBBB. Additional prospective study is warranted.

The relationship of QRS morphology and mechanical dyssynchrony to long-term outcome following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

AIMS: Because benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) appear to be less favourable in non-left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients, this prospective longitudinal study tested the hypothesis that QRS morphology and echocardiographic mechanical dyssynchrony were associated with long-term outcome after CRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two-hundred and seventy-eight consecutive New York Heart Association class III and IV CRT patients with QRS ≥120 ms and ejection fraction ≤35% were studied. The pre-specified primary endpoint was death, heart transplant, or left ventricular assist device over 4 years. Dyssynchrony assessed before CRT included interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) and speckle-tracking radial strain using pre-specified cut-offs for each. Of 254 with baseline quantitative echocardiographic data available, 128 had LBBB, 81 had intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD), and 45 had right bundle branch block (RBBB). Radial dyssynchrony was observed in 85% of the patients with LBBB, 59% with IVCD*, and 40% with RBBB* (*P < 0.01 vs. LBBB). Of 248 (98%) with follow-up, LBBB patients had a significantly more favourable long-term survival than non-LBBB patients. However, non-LBBB patients with dyssynchrony had a more favourable event-free survival than those without dyssynchrony: radial dyssynchrony hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-4.53 (P = 0.0008) and IVMD hazard ratio 4.9, 95% CI 2.60-9.16 (P = 0.0007). Right bundle branch block patients who lacked dyssynchrony had the least favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: Non-LBBB patients with dyssynchrony had a more favourable long-term survival than non-LBBB patients who lacked dyssynchrony. Mechanical dyssynchrony and QRS morphology are associated with outcome following CRT.